|
Post by Lucius Malfoy on May 1, 2022 17:51:50 GMT 10
Yeah my thoughts exactly. A meet up as a reward is likely, if split. Top name idea!
I think that was the idea behind day 0. I could be compeltely wrong of course. But it just shows again how we think differently and how glad I am we were able to be up front about all that. I'm taking on board everything your suggesting here because your thought process is different to mine and its really helping my understand a different perspective. This is something I struggle with in ORGs (understanding other people's perspectives). But because I trust you 100% I'm taking the time to listen to what your saying as opposed to my normal reaction to it from other players, which is that they're sketchy etc., I guess just like you thought about me.
|
|
|
Post by Oliver Wood on May 1, 2022 18:24:26 GMT 10
I think your suggestion about day 0 makes a lot of sense. It just doesn't make sense from the perspective of nominating a partner upon sign up.
It wasn't so much about thinking you were sketchy but more appearing to me that you were trying to keep your options open when I was the only option you had. I think the chat was good but that's how it looked to me. I suppose the difficulty in these games is needing to at least keep up with everyone you can but also making sure you have 2-3 decent relationships you can leverage and pivot around. I see Survivor relationships as a dream catcher where everyone is connected but the strength of the group sits in a circle and everyone is trying to identify either the weakest link or the strongest one but making sure that whatever one is removed, their position isn't weakened in the circle.
|
|